jf 16610 site forum.replica-watch.info | JF 16610LV vs. Gen early 16610 (orginally thought a 16800) jf 16610 site forum.replica-watch.info good choice for using the JF 16610 LN base for your 16800 project because the JF 16610 LN has a shallow-looking rehaut which corresponds to the 16800's unique characteristic Available through the OMEGA online shop, the Seamaster 300 is built with OMEGA's most cutting‑edge technology, including automatic Co‑Axial mechanical movements, and .
0 · [QC] JF 16610LN SH3135 Submariner : r/RepTime
1 · Opinions on direction to go with JF 16610 : r/RepTime
2 · My JF 16610LV franken
3 · Jf 16610
4 · JF 16610LV vs. Gen early 16610 (orginally thought a 16800)
5 · JF 16610 Upgrade Guide
6 · JF 16610 LN modding question
7 · GEN or fake/replica 16610..?
8 · Does it look like the JF 16610LN at Trusty Time
9 · Best "Currently Available" 16610 Rep?
While remaining true to its original design, the Explorer is now available in two sizes: 36 mm in diameter, identical to the original model, or in a 40 mm version. In 2021, the dial of the Explorer, together with that of the Explorer II, was the first to benefit from an improved Chromalight display.
[QC] JF 16610LN SH3135 Submariner : r/RepTime
The BP is ok, but the bezel construction is not gen like- but it's still a good looking watch. I always thought a BP with the Miyota 9015 movement would be a good beater watch- good movement and decent looks. The JF is the best option these days, but you might have to get the movement serviced.
good choice for using the JF 16610 LN base for your 16800 project because the JF 16610 LN has a shallow-looking rehaut which corresponds to the 16800's unique characteristic
It's too bad that the JF 16610 has been discontinued, but I suppose it wasn't a huge seller for them. It seems like the greatest demand is for the most current models. Oh well.
The dedicated place for all discussions on replica watches. No selling or trading, no trusted dealers here, just discussions. Lots of info in the sidebar! Welcome!Posted July 5, 2017. That definitely looks like the very JF 16610 LN that I'm anxiously waiting to be released! Thanks for the info. Now I just have to wait another month for all the early adopters to post their reviews - to see if all the updates have been implemented. themannier. Member. 1.6k. Gender:Male. Location:Lyon, FRANCE. On to the comparative photos. This 16800 is very aged, the bezel notches are smoother than the 16610 due to wear over time: The rehaut is the same depth, making a sanded and polished 16610 rehaut a legit option. The 16800 bracelet is slightly more polished due to .
Not mine. Chap posted this on another forum. The bezel pearl is well off however the sapphire looks ok as do the hands. Any opinions from the fake spotters? #1. Hi everyone, Since i discovered the 3135 clone movement, i thought i finally have an opportunity to work on a rolex movement, at a fraction of the price. I eventually bought a JF 16610LV on M2M here and her i am, hunting for good deals on ebay&co. NOTE: This is not a guide nor a tutorial.
you have to drill out the case a tad to get it to sit flush, then retap. Easy enough to do if your handy and have the right tools. tap size is M3 x .35 Thanks! I've asked this a few times on RWI without success. 356K subscribers in the RepTime community. The dedicated place for all discussions on replica watches. No selling or trading, no trusted dealers. The BP is ok, but the bezel construction is not gen like- but it's still a good looking watch. I always thought a BP with the Miyota 9015 movement would be a good beater watch- good movement and decent looks. The JF is the best option these days, but you might have to get the movement serviced. good choice for using the JF 16610 LN base for your 16800 project because the JF 16610 LN has a shallow-looking rehaut which corresponds to the 16800's unique characteristic
It's too bad that the JF 16610 has been discontinued, but I suppose it wasn't a huge seller for them. It seems like the greatest demand is for the most current models. Oh well. The dedicated place for all discussions on replica watches. No selling or trading, no trusted dealers here, just discussions. Lots of info in the sidebar! Welcome!Posted July 5, 2017. That definitely looks like the very JF 16610 LN that I'm anxiously waiting to be released! Thanks for the info. Now I just have to wait another month for all the early adopters to post their reviews - to see if all the updates have been implemented. themannier. Member. 1.6k. Gender:Male. Location:Lyon, FRANCE. On to the comparative photos. This 16800 is very aged, the bezel notches are smoother than the 16610 due to wear over time: The rehaut is the same depth, making a sanded and polished 16610 rehaut a legit option. The 16800 bracelet is slightly more polished due to .
Opinions on direction to go with JF 16610 : r/RepTime
My JF 16610LV franken
Not mine. Chap posted this on another forum. The bezel pearl is well off however the sapphire looks ok as do the hands. Any opinions from the fake spotters? #1. Hi everyone, Since i discovered the 3135 clone movement, i thought i finally have an opportunity to work on a rolex movement, at a fraction of the price. I eventually bought a JF 16610LV on M2M here and her i am, hunting for good deals on ebay&co. NOTE: This is not a guide nor a tutorial. you have to drill out the case a tad to get it to sit flush, then retap. Easy enough to do if your handy and have the right tools. tap size is M3 x .35 Thanks! I've asked this a few times on RWI without success.
356K subscribers in the RepTime community. The dedicated place for all discussions on replica watches. No selling or trading, no trusted dealers.
The BP is ok, but the bezel construction is not gen like- but it's still a good looking watch. I always thought a BP with the Miyota 9015 movement would be a good beater watch- good movement and decent looks. The JF is the best option these days, but you might have to get the movement serviced. good choice for using the JF 16610 LN base for your 16800 project because the JF 16610 LN has a shallow-looking rehaut which corresponds to the 16800's unique characteristic It's too bad that the JF 16610 has been discontinued, but I suppose it wasn't a huge seller for them. It seems like the greatest demand is for the most current models. Oh well. The dedicated place for all discussions on replica watches. No selling or trading, no trusted dealers here, just discussions. Lots of info in the sidebar! Welcome!
Posted July 5, 2017. That definitely looks like the very JF 16610 LN that I'm anxiously waiting to be released! Thanks for the info. Now I just have to wait another month for all the early adopters to post their reviews - to see if all the updates have been implemented. themannier. Member. 1.6k. Gender:Male. Location:Lyon, FRANCE. On to the comparative photos. This 16800 is very aged, the bezel notches are smoother than the 16610 due to wear over time: The rehaut is the same depth, making a sanded and polished 16610 rehaut a legit option. The 16800 bracelet is slightly more polished due to . Not mine. Chap posted this on another forum. The bezel pearl is well off however the sapphire looks ok as do the hands. Any opinions from the fake spotters?
#1. Hi everyone, Since i discovered the 3135 clone movement, i thought i finally have an opportunity to work on a rolex movement, at a fraction of the price. I eventually bought a JF 16610LV on M2M here and her i am, hunting for good deals on ebay&co. NOTE: This is not a guide nor a tutorial. you have to drill out the case a tad to get it to sit flush, then retap. Easy enough to do if your handy and have the right tools. tap size is M3 x .35 Thanks! I've asked this a few times on RWI without success.
Jf 16610
JF 16610LV vs. Gen early 16610 (orginally thought a 16800)
Rolex is introducing four new white Rolesor versions (combining Oystersteel and white gold) of the Oyster Perpetual Datejust 31. The first watch, featuring a bezel set with 46 brilliant-cut diamonds, has an aubergine, sunray-finish dial that is adorned with a .
jf 16610 site forum.replica-watch.info|JF 16610LV vs. Gen early 16610 (orginally thought a 16800)
